Complexity should never obscure the rationale.
We have seen weighted scoring frameworks become so complicated that the calculation is harder to explain than the risk itself. More weightings do not automatically produce a better assessment; they can create a false impression of precision and hide the professional judgement underneath.
Rotunda keeps the logic proportionate and traceable. A reviewer can see the evidence, follow the scoring and understand why the firm reached its conclusion.
The methodology takes account of applicable national regulatory guidance, FATF standards, Wolfsberg Group guidance and established industry practice. It provides a consistent framework without replacing the firm’s own risk-based judgement.
We have explained the methodology in detail to regulators. They could follow the logic from the underlying inputs to the final risk conclusion.
