Adapt the framework without a rebuild.
Tune the settings available to your organisation as its risk appetite, methodology or operating model changes. Routine configuration should not require a software change request or a new implementation fee.
Enterprise-wide Risk Assessment (EWRA) / A Rotunda product
Rotunda brings methodology, evidence, scoring and oversight into one consistent process—without turning your assessment into an IT programme.
The data comes first
It is the cherry on top, not the reason to digitise your assessment.
Most of the benefit comes from replacing scattered documents with structured, consistent data. Rotunda keeps answers, scores and conclusions in a machine-readable format, so each assessment leaves a richer record behind. The next review becomes easier to compare, challenge and improve, creating a useful data flywheel: better inputs, clearer trends and stronger decisions.
Machine-readable CSV and Markdown results can be exported for use with LLMs and other analysis tools approved by your organisation. Rotunda also offers optional AI assistance to help authorised users interrogate results, identify themes, draft summaries and give the final narrative a quick polish. It supports the practitioner; it does not invent evidence, set the firm’s risk appetite or replace accountable judgement.
Use structured questionnaires across customers, products, geography, channels and emerging risks. Each response carries its supporting rationale and evidence, so reviewers can follow how the conclusion was reached.
What proportion of customers are legal persons?
25–50%Does the firm serve politically exposed persons?
LimitedSummarise the supporting data and rationale.
Evaluate control design and operating effectiveness against clear criteria. Rotunda calculates residual risk consistently while preserving the underlying judgements for review.
Run a separate sanctions risk assessment without losing the firm-wide view. Keep sanctions-specific exposure, controls and conclusions distinct from the wider financial crime methodology.
Products, jurisdictions, ownership and transaction exposure
Route assessments through preparation, review, second-line challenge and approval. Comments remain attached to the relevant answer, with dates and decisions preserved in the audit trail.
Compare current and prior assessments side by side. Focus review time on material changes in exposure, controls and residual risk, with the reason recorded.
Export a clear report of the methodology, inputs, scoring, challenge and conclusions. Use CSV for further analysis or Markdown with approved LLM tools — yes, we know your LLM likes that — and retain the complete audit history.
See the workflow
Explore the demonstration environment or arrange a focused walkthrough.
Second-line reviewer17 Jun, 10:42Please reconcile this score to the customer segmentation data.
Domain owner18 Jun, 09:15Updated with the Q2 population extract and revised rationale.